https://theprpost.com/post/16140/

Study reveals playing is safe is marketing’s riskiest strategy

A new collaborative report from FleishmanHillard and Contagious, titled “The Chaos Advantage,” reveals that during periods of macro disruption, playing it safe carries a much heavier penalty than taking calculated risks.The study combines a survey of 1,000 senior marketing and communications leaders across North America, EMEA, and APAC with an analysis of recent Cannes Lions and Effie Award winners evaluated through WARC’s GEISTE framework (Government, Economy, Industry, Society, Technology, and Environment).Key Findings on the Cost of Caution• Opportunity Over Caution: 87% of leaders agree that uncertain environments create prime opportunities for bold work, with 58% noting that missing out through caution happens far more often than facing negative consequences from bold action.• The Backlash Myth (The "Ed Sheeran Effect"): Safe brands and bold brands face public backlash at nearly identical rates (20% vs. 21%), disproving the theory that playing it safe shields a brand from criticism.• The Price of Dull Content: Defaulting to uninspired creative comes with a steep financial toll. Dull content requires an estimated $189 billion in extra media spend globally to match effective creative, while brand conversion drops by 37% and long-term ROI falls by 14%.• Paralysis by Process: Two-thirds (66%) of respondents report that internal risk management processes block action rather than enable it, with campaign launches and creative approvals grinding to a halt during times of crisis.• Competitor Capitalization: 42% of surveyed leaders have watched competitors steal market share simply because their own organizations hesitated.“The data makes clear that uncertainty is now the operating condition, not a moment to wait out,” says Ellie Tuck, Chief Creative Officer, Americas at FleishmanHillard. “Organizations that treat caution as a risk management strategy are actually multiplying their risk.”Understanding the Chaos AdvantageAccording to the report, The Chaos Advantage occurs when a brand converts a live macro threat into business growth by confronting real-world issues with conviction to earn trust at scale.While 86% of professionals view the current landscape as increasingly unpredictable and 65.3% admit to feeling overwhelmed over the past year, high-performing brands differentiate themselves through three operational hallmarks:1. Articulating External Threats: Aligning campaign objectives with a macro-level shift defined by the GEISTE framework.2. Data-Informed Escalation: Using real-time data to validate the urgency of the issue and drive proactive strategy.3. Ambitious Success Metrics: Challenging category restraints and treating complexity as an opportunity to build brand relevance.The study notes that earned media channels—such as PR, social, owned media, events, and online video—serve as the primary vehicles for driving this advantage, focusing on interactive education rather than pure broadcasting reach.A Roadmap for Bolder StrategyThe report concludes with a strategic framework for communicators looking to break through internal paralysis:• Right to Participate: Ensuring the idea matches the brand’s existing equity and customer reputation.• Reason to Watch: Utilizing bold, thumb-stopping creativity to break through noisy conversations.• Ability to Execute: Streamlining internal barriers so organizations can move quickly, boldly, and safely.To explore these findings further, FleishmanHillard and Contagious will be hosting a series of events across the United States and United Kingdom highlighting modern communications solutions designed to drive business growth amidst market chaos.
https://theprpost.com/post/15933/

Third-party validation dictates consumer trust: Brazen APAC- CARMA study

Social channels may dominate product discovery across Southeast Asia, but traditional word-of-mouth and third-party validation still dictate consumer trust, according to a joint study by PR agency Brazen APAC and media intelligence firm CARMA.The research reveals a sharp contrast in how audiences in Singapore and Malaysia encounter brands versus how they evaluate their credibility, highlighting a growing split between social media reach and purchasing confidence.The Trust Gap in Brand DiscoveryWhile 61% of survey participants cite social networks as their primary discovery tool—far outstripping personal experience (32%) and digital reviews (30%)—top-of-funnel visibility rarely translates into direct trust.• High-Credibility Formats: User-generated customer content proved most persuasive, with 35% of respondents rating it highest for credibility, followed by expert-led reviews at 30%.• Low-Credibility Formats: Content generated directly by brands or sponsored influencers trailed significantly, each securing just 12% of consumer trust.• Voice Preference: Everyday users emerged as the most reliable spokespeople for 61% of respondents, vastly outranking micro-influencers (17%) and high-profile celebrities (15%)."Influence has not faded; it has matured. Consumers still discover through the biggest channels, but they decide through the most credible ones," said Angeline Tan, General Manager of Brazen APAC. "The strongest strategies understand the role each voice plays, from creating initial interest to providing the proof that turns attention into action."Regional Divergence: Singapore vs. MalaysiaThe data exposes distinct behavioral differences between the two neighboring markets, challenging standard regional marketing templates.In Singapore, peer validation holds sway: 41% of consumers prioritize customer-generated content for proof, compared to only 20% who look to industry experts. Conversely, Malaysian consumers lean heavily on authority, with 41% prioritizing expert validation over customer reviews (28%)."Regional campaigns still treat Singapore and Malaysia as two versions of the same audience. The data says otherwise," Tan noted. "Consumers in both markets want authenticity, but Singapore looks to other customers for proof, while Malaysia places greater weight on expertise."Overall, 46% of respondents across both nations indicated they trust relatable, grounded brand identities over those emphasizing luxury or aspiration (14%).The Impact of Generative SearchThe findings coincide with a broader shift in digital discovery driven by artificial intelligence. Related research from CARMA indicates that 70% of consumers across G20 nations now utilize AI-powered tools to evaluate corporate offerings, shifting search behavior from keyword-based queries to conversational prompts.Because large language models rely overwhelmingly on earned media, editorial coverage, and authoritative review databases for over 80% of their citations, the report emphasizes that third-party credibility will prove critical for brand visibility in AI-driven search environments.(Image by Pixelkult from Pixabay)